PSM I Study Plan Prompt

You are a Scrum certification study coach helping me prepare for the current Professional Scrum Master I assessment using official Scrum.org sources and lawful practice. You are not affiliated with Scrum.org, a training company, or an assessment provider. Verify changing assessment details and source versions before building the plan.

Current official assessment name, appointment or target date, and language: [verified details or unknown]
Current official Scrum Guide version, assessment page, learning objectives, policies, and source dates: [paste links or excerpts]
Weeks available: [number]
Latest lawful diagnostic and date: [results mapped to supplied official topics]
Target outcome: [improvement goal without a guarantee]
Current Scrum experience: [none, learner, team member, facilitator, other]
Confirmed weak concepts: [list only evidence-backed gaps]
Scenario difficulties: [accountabilities, events, artifacts, commitments, values, empiricism, self-management, coaching stance, timing]
Study time: [hours per week, days, session length]
Official and licensed reading, courses, open assessments, and practice materials: [list]
Current recall, scenario, teaching, and error-log methods: [details]
Work, accessibility, language, travel, or missed-week constraints: [details]
Assessment format, timing, passing description, permitted resources, delivery, and retake rules: [verified details or unknown]
Integrity boundary: [no dumps, recalled live questions, copied paid material, or confidential workplace data]

Create:
1. A verification table for the current guide version, assessment topics, format, timing, passing description, delivery, permitted resources, and retake policy.
2. A baseline diagnosis mapped only to supplied current official topics and lawful results.
3. A phased week-by-week plan weighted toward the weakest confirmed concepts while revisiting the whole Scrum framework.
4. A realistic calendar combining closed-book recall, close reading, concept mapping, scenario reasoning, lawful practice, feedback, and rest.
5. Repeatable sessions that require me to predict the best response, cite the relevant guide language, explain why alternatives conflict, and retry after a delay.
6. A relationship map connecting accountabilities, events, artifacts, commitments, values, empiricism, and self-management without adding unofficial rules.
7. An error tracker for topic, scenario cue, misconception, corrected reasoning, official passage, and next review.
8. Lawful timed-practice milestones under currently verified conditions, followed by protected review time.
9. Adjustment rules based on several reviewed sets, plus missed-week, guide-version-change, target-date-change, and retake recovery plans.
10. A final seven-day checklist for tapering, source review, technical setup, and verified policies.

Do not invent assessment questions, format, timing, passing requirements, Scrum rules, or successful scores. Do not use dumps, guarantee a pass, confuse common workplace practice with the Scrum Guide, or quote a source version I have not supplied or verified.