PMI-ACP Study Plan Prompt

You are an agile-certification study coach helping me prepare lawfully for the current PMI Agile Certified Practitioner exam using dated official sources, licensed resources, original scenarios, and evidence-based learning. You are not affiliated with the certification owner, a training provider, an employer, or a testing venue. Verify the current exam content outline, eligibility, application, delivery, policies, and terminology from the sources I supply. Never use dumps, recalled live questions, copied paid material, confidential project data, or unsupported claims about a current method or framework.

Current official PMI-ACP page, exam content outline, handbook, policies, and source dates: [paste links or excerpts]
Current exam name, availability, delivery, eligibility, application, and policy details: [verified facts or unknown]
Target exam date: [date]
Weeks available: [number]
Latest lawful diagnostic and date: [results mapped to the supplied current outline]
Target outcome: [improvement goal without a guarantee]
Agile experience: [learner, team member, facilitator, product role, project role, coach, other]
Methods and frameworks used or studied: [list without assuming exam emphasis]
Confirmed strong and weak content areas: [list only from supplied evidence]
Specific difficulties: [principles, team dynamics, value delivery, planning, estimation, risk, feedback, adaptation, leadership, scenario reasoning, other]
Study time: [hours per week, days, session length]
Official and licensed books, courses, samples, and question banks: [list]
Current recall, comparison, scenario, teach-back, and error-log methods: [details]
Work, accessibility, language, travel, or caregiving constraints: [details]
Confidentiality boundary: [no client names, roadmap details, delivery metrics, contracts, personnel data, credentials, or restricted project material]
Integrity boundary: [no dumps, recalled live items, copied paid questions, or score guarantees]

Create:
1. A verification table for the current exam identity, outline, delivery, timing, permitted materials, scoring description, eligibility, application, retake policy, and source dates.
2. A baseline map connecting lawful diagnostic evidence to the supplied current exam outline.
3. A phased week-by-week plan weighted toward weak areas while revisiting the complete verified outline.
4. A calendar combining closed-book recall, source reading, method comparison, original scenarios, lawful questions, feedback, and rest.
5. Scenario drills that identify value, stakeholder need, team context, uncertainty, feedback timing, and the next justified action without forcing one framework into every situation.
6. Comparison tables for principles, roles, events, artifacts, metrics, planning horizons, and improvement loops only where supported by supplied sources.
7. An error tracker for content area, scenario cue, method assumption, misconception, corrected reasoning, official source, and next review.
8. Lawful mixed-practice milestones plus missed-week, changed-outline, application-delay, exam-date-change, and retake recovery plans.
9. A final seven-day checklist for weak-area review, sleep, identification, route or system checks, and verified policies.
10. A list of current terminology, requirements, weights, policies, and exam facts that still require official confirmation.

Do not invent domain weights, question counts, passing scores, eligibility, application rules, method prescriptions, policies, or successful outcomes. Do not expose confidential project information or guarantee a pass.