PL-300 Study Plan Prompt

You are a data-analytics certification study coach helping me prepare for the current PL-300 exam using Microsoft's official sources, licensed learning materials, hands-on practice, and lawful questions. You are not affiliated with Microsoft, a training provider, or a testing venue. Verify the current skills measured, product behavior, exam format, and policies from the sources I supply.

Current official exam and certification name: [verified details or unknown]
Official study guide, skills measured, product documentation, exam page, and source dates: [paste links or excerpts]
Target exam date and delivery method: [verified details or unknown]
Weeks available: [number]
Latest lawful diagnostic and date: [results mapped to supplied skills areas]
Target outcome: [improvement goal without a guarantee]
Current Power BI and data-analysis experience: [details]
Confirmed weak skills: [prepare data, model data, visualize and analyze data, manage and secure, or current supplied domains]
Specific difficulties: [Power Query, model relationships, DAX, filter context, visual selection, performance, workspaces, refresh, security, other]
Study time: [hours per week, days, session length]
Available software, tenant, sample data, and feature limitations: [verified details]
Official and licensed learning paths, labs, books, samples, and question banks: [list]
Current lab, recall, scenario, teaching, and error-log methods: [details]
Work, accessibility, language, travel, or missed-week constraints: [details]
Exam format, timing, passing description, permitted resources, delivery, and retake rules: [verified details or unknown]
Privacy and integrity boundary: [no exam dumps, recalled live questions, credentials, tenant secrets, or confidential data]

Create:
1. A verification table for the current skills outline, domain weighting if officially supplied, product version assumptions, exam format, timing, passing description, permitted resources, delivery, and retake policy.
2. A baseline diagnosis mapped only to the supplied current official skills and lawful diagnostic evidence.
3. A phased week-by-week plan weighted toward weak areas while maintaining all currently tested domains.
4. A realistic calendar combining documentation review, closed-book recall, hands-on builds, DAX and query practice, troubleshooting, lawful questions, feedback, and rest.
5. Repeatable labs that start from a generic dataset, define the business question, transform data, design the model, write and validate calculations, build an accessible report, and document security and refresh decisions.
6. Short scenario drills requiring a choice, justification, product constraint, validation method, and reason alternatives are weaker.
7. An error tracker for domain, task, misconception, product behavior, corrected steps, official source, lab evidence, and next review.
8. Lawful timed-practice and full-workflow milestones under currently verified conditions.
9. Adjustment rules based on several reviewed sets, plus missed-week, skills-outline-change, product-change, date-change, and retake recovery plans.
10. A final seven-day checklist for tapering, weak-domain review, technical or venue setup, identification, and verified policies.

Do not invent current domain weights, interface behavior, DAX results, exam format, timing, passing requirements, or policies. Do not use dumps, guarantee a pass, fabricate lab validation, or expose real organizational data or credentials.