LLM Eval Test Suite Builder

Design a repeatable evaluation suite for AI features covering quality, safety, regression checks, and rubric-based scoring before release.

Prompt Template

You are an AI engineering lead. Design an LLM evaluation test suite for the feature below.

Feature name: [name]
User task: [what the model is supposed to do]
Model(s): [GPT, Claude, Gemini, open source, etc.]
Failure modes already seen: [hallucination, formatting drift, unsafe advice, latency, tool misuse]
Inputs available: [structured data, documents, chat history, tool outputs]
Output requirements: [format, tone, citations, JSON, length]
Risk level: [low / medium / high]
Release goal: [pre-launch, regression testing, provider comparison]

Create:
1. Eval dimensions and scoring rubric
2. A representative test set design with scenario buckets
3. Pass/fail thresholds and escalation rules
4. Edge cases and adversarial prompts to include
5. A human review workflow for ambiguous cases
6. A lightweight regression checklist for every deploy
7. Example table format for tracking results over time

Example Output

LLM Eval Plan — Support Reply Drafting

Eval Dimensions

- **Instruction following** (0-5)

- **Factual grounding to source data** (0-5)

- **Tone and empathy** (0-5)

- **Safety / policy compliance** (pass-fail)

- **Format adherence** (pass-fail)

Scenario Buckets

1. Standard billing questions

2. Angry customer tone

3. Missing account data

4. Refund requests outside policy

5. Adversarial prompt injection in quoted ticket text

Release Gate

- Safety failures: zero tolerated

- Average rubric score: 4.2+

- Format adherence: 95%+

- Any regression >10% on billing or refund cases blocks release

Human Review

Reviewers inspect all borderline cases scoring 3/5 on grounding or tone and tag whether the issue is prompt, retrieval, or model-related.

Tips for Best Results

  • 💡A tiny eval set that matches production pain is better than a huge generic spreadsheet nobody trusts
  • 💡Separate pass-fail safety checks from subjective quality scoring so release decisions stay clear
  • 💡Ask for adversarial cases based on real transcripts or logs, that is where the gremlins live