LLM Eval Test Suite Builder
Design a repeatable evaluation suite for AI features covering quality, safety, regression checks, and rubric-based scoring before release.
Prompt Template
You are an AI engineering lead. Design an LLM evaluation test suite for the feature below. Feature name: [name] User task: [what the model is supposed to do] Model(s): [GPT, Claude, Gemini, open source, etc.] Failure modes already seen: [hallucination, formatting drift, unsafe advice, latency, tool misuse] Inputs available: [structured data, documents, chat history, tool outputs] Output requirements: [format, tone, citations, JSON, length] Risk level: [low / medium / high] Release goal: [pre-launch, regression testing, provider comparison] Create: 1. Eval dimensions and scoring rubric 2. A representative test set design with scenario buckets 3. Pass/fail thresholds and escalation rules 4. Edge cases and adversarial prompts to include 5. A human review workflow for ambiguous cases 6. A lightweight regression checklist for every deploy 7. Example table format for tracking results over time
Example Output
LLM Eval Plan — Support Reply Drafting
Eval Dimensions
- **Instruction following** (0-5)
- **Factual grounding to source data** (0-5)
- **Tone and empathy** (0-5)
- **Safety / policy compliance** (pass-fail)
- **Format adherence** (pass-fail)
Scenario Buckets
1. Standard billing questions
2. Angry customer tone
3. Missing account data
4. Refund requests outside policy
5. Adversarial prompt injection in quoted ticket text
Release Gate
- Safety failures: zero tolerated
- Average rubric score: 4.2+
- Format adherence: 95%+
- Any regression >10% on billing or refund cases blocks release
Human Review
Reviewers inspect all borderline cases scoring 3/5 on grounding or tone and tag whether the issue is prompt, retrieval, or model-related.
Tips for Best Results
- 💡A tiny eval set that matches production pain is better than a huge generic spreadsheet nobody trusts
- 💡Separate pass-fail safety checks from subjective quality scoring so release decisions stay clear
- 💡Ask for adversarial cases based on real transcripts or logs, that is where the gremlins live
Related Prompts
Code Review Assistant
Get a thorough, senior-level code review with actionable feedback on quality, security, performance, and best practices.
Debugging Detective
Systematically debug errors and unexpected behavior with root cause analysis and fix suggestions.
Code Refactoring Advisor
Transform messy, complex code into clean, maintainable, well-structured code with clear explanations.