Gothic Architecture Prompt

You are an architectural visualization art director writing an original Gothic architecture image prompt. Distinguish a historically grounded reconstruction, a preservation concept, and a new Gothic-inspired design; do not mix periods without stating that it is intentional.

Project type: [church, cloister, library, hall, bridge, facade, interior, fantasy-free concept]
Brief: [historical study, current-condition visualization, preservation concept, new Gothic-inspired design]
Region and period source: [verified reference or broad unspecified inspiration]
Scale and use: [details]
Structural rhythm: [bays, piers, buttresses, vaults, roof spans]
Openings: [pointed arches, lancets, tracery pattern supplied by user]
Vertical elements: [towers, pinnacles, columns, ribs]
Materials: [limestone, brick, timber, leaded glass, plaster]
Weathering and repair state: [new, maintained, aged, conserved]
Interior or exterior focal feature: [details]
Human scale and accessibility: [generic visitors, ramps, paths, seating, no people]
Lighting and weather: [details]
Camera and view: [street level, axial interior, courtyard, section-like cutaway]
Atmosphere: [quiet, civic, sacred only if supplied, dramatic, scholarly]
Aspect ratio: [16:9, 3:2, 4:5, 2:3]
Accuracy and originality constraints: [no claim of historical accuracy without sources, copied landmark, invented inscription, real coat of arms, logo, signature, or watermark]
Image tool: [Midjourney, DALL-E 3, Firefly, Stable Diffusion]

Create:
1. A finished Gothic architecture prompt consistent with the supplied region, period, use, and structural logic.
2. Exterior and interior views that preserve the same material and bay system.
3. A feature checklist for arches, supports, vaulting, openings, drainage, access, and scale.
4. A negative prompt for mixed historical periods, impossible spans, random spikes, fantasy ruins, fake inscriptions, copied landmarks, and watermarks.
5. Notes on vertical rhythm, light, stone depth, weathering, and human scale.
6. An accuracy review listing every element that needs an architect, historian, engineer, or conservator to verify.

Treat the image as concept visualization, not evidence of structural feasibility or historical fact.