Fraud Pattern and Chargeback Analysis

Analyze payment fraud, chargeback trends, risky segments, and prevention levers using transaction, dispute, and customer behavior data.

Prompt Template

You are a payments risk analyst. Analyze fraud and chargeback patterns and recommend prevention actions.

**Business type:** [marketplace / ecommerce / SaaS / fintech / subscription / travel]
**Time period:** [date range]
**Transaction volume:** [orders, revenue, average order value]
**Chargeback volume:** [count, amount, rate]
**Fraud signals available:** [AVS/CVV result, device ID, IP country, billing/shipping mismatch, velocity, email age]
**Customer/order fields:** [country, product, channel, payment method, customer age, coupon, shipping speed]
**Known incidents:** [promo abuse, account takeover, card testing, friendly fraud, refund abuse]
**Current controls:** [3DS, manual review, fraud tool, rules, order holds]
**Risk tolerance:** [minimize losses / minimize false positives / balanced]

Provide:
1. **Executive summary** of fraud rate, chargeback rate, financial impact, and trend direction.
2. **Segment analysis** by channel, geography, product, payment method, device, new vs returning customer, and order value band.
3. **Pattern hypotheses** with evidence and confidence level.
4. **Rule candidates**: suggested prevention rules with estimated impact and false-positive risk.
5. **Manual review queue design**: priority score, required evidence, SLA, and decision outcomes.
6. **Dashboard spec** with leading indicators, lagging indicators, and alert thresholds.
7. **Experiment plan** to test new controls without harming legitimate conversion.
8. **Next data to collect** to improve detection quality.

Use tables where helpful and separate confirmed findings from hypotheses.

Example Output

Fraud and Chargeback Readout: DTC Electronics

Executive Summary

Chargeback rate rose from 0.42% to 0.91% in four weeks, creating $48,200 in disputed revenue. The spike is concentrated in paid social orders for high-value accessories with expedited shipping.

Segment Findings

| Segment | Order Share | Chargeback Rate | Loss | Signal |

|---|---:|---:|---:|---|

| Paid social + new customers | 18% | 2.4% | $31,600 | High velocity, coupon stacking |

| AOV over $300 | 9% | 3.1% | $22,100 | Billing/shipping mismatch |

| Returning customers | 44% | 0.18% | $3,900 | Low risk |

Rule Candidates

| Rule | Expected Impact | False Positive Risk | Recommendation |

|---|---|---|---|

| Step-up 3DS for new customers with AOV > $250 and mismatch | High | Medium | Test on 50% traffic |

| Hold expedited orders with 3+ failed payment attempts | Medium | Low | Implement immediately |

| Block all paid social orders from high-risk countries | High | High | Do not implement; too blunt |

Dashboard Alerts

Alert when hourly card declines exceed 2x baseline, chargeback rate exceeds 0.75% for 7 days, or one device ID places more than 5 orders in 30 minutes.

Tips for Best Results

  • ๐Ÿ’กSeparate fraud prevention from conversion protection; an overly aggressive rule can cost more than the fraud it stops.
  • ๐Ÿ’กAnalyze chargebacks by order date and dispute date โ€” they answer different questions.
  • ๐Ÿ’กLook for combinations of weak signals. One mismatch may be normal; mismatch plus velocity plus expedited shipping is a story.
  • ๐Ÿ’กAlways estimate false positives before recommending blocks.