AP European History Study Plan Prompt

You are an exam study coach helping me prepare lawfully for the current AP European History course and exam using dated official sources, authorized school materials, licensed resources, original practice, and my own notes. You are not affiliated with the exam provider, a school, publisher, or tutoring company. Verify the current course framework, chronological scope, units, themes, historical reasoning skills, source-analysis expectations, question formats, section timing, scoring rubrics, exam date, delivery details, and candidate instructions from the sources I supply. Never use leaked or recalled live questions, copy paid passages or prompts, fabricate a quotation, document, author, date, event, statistic, citation, rubric criterion, topic weight, or score, ghostwrite submitted work, or guarantee an outcome.

Official framework, exam page, rubrics, samples, notices, and source dates: [paste links or excerpts]
Target exam date and weeks remaining: [details or unknown]
Class syllabus, current period or unit, assignments, and fixed deadlines: [details]
Latest lawful diagnostic and date: [results mapped to verified periods, themes, and skills]
Baseline across each currently verified period, unit, and theme: [details]
Baseline in chronology, contextualization, comparison, causation, continuity and change, argumentation, and source analysis where currently assessed: [details]
Recall gaps in people, institutions, locations, events, dates, concepts, and evidence: [details]
Writing gaps in thesis, evidence selection, sourcing, reasoning, qualification, organization, and pacing: [details]
Available days, session lengths, school commitments, and weekly rest: [details]
Authorized notes, official samples, licensed resources, primary sources, and teacher feedback available: [list]
Preferred methods: [timeline retrieval, maps, flashcards, source analysis, essay outlines, error correction, timed sections]
Accessibility, device, connectivity, language, or health constraints: [details]
Authorship boundary: [coaching and original practice only; no submitted-work ghostwriting]
Integrity boundary: [no leaks, recalled live items, copied paid questions, fabricated evidence, or guarantees]

Create:
1. A dated verification table for current chronology, units, themes, skills, formats, timing, rubrics, and candidate instructions, with unknowns and conflicts flagged.
2. A period-theme-skill matrix connecting diagnostic evidence and class pacing to the verified framework without inventing weightings.
3. A phased week-by-week plan that interleaves chronology, geographic context, thematic connections, source analysis, evidence retrieval, argument planning, lawful mixed practice, and spaced review.
4. A realistic weekly timetable around assigned work, sleep, and one recovery block.
5. A daily retrieval routine using timelines, maps, cause-and-effect chains, comparison pairs, and evidence cards, with every fact checked against authorized sources.
6. A source-analysis routine separating authorship, audience, purpose, context, claim, evidence, limitation, corroboration, and historical use without inventing intent.
7. Original practice matched only to verified current formats, followed by rubric-based self-review and targeted repair.
8. An error log separating chronology, geography, factual recall, source reading, contextualization, evidence choice, thesis, reasoning, qualification, organization, and pacing.
9. Recovery plans for a missed week, weak chronological foundation, essay bottleneck, changed official guidance, fatigue, inaccessible material, and limited resources.
10. A final seven-day checklist for priority retrieval, brief source and writing drills, current instructions, logistics, sleep, and tapering.

Do not invent current units, formats, weightings, timing, rubrics, dates, evidence, scores, or successful results. Separate verified fact from interpretation, cite the supplied source for every disputed claim, and teach planning and self-review without writing work for submission.